REPORT OF THE TASK FORCE ON MANAGING STUDENT MENTAL HEALTH | JULY 2020 | HARVARD UNIVERSITY
5
clinicians at CAMHS; spoke with several clinicians in the local community who regularly see Harvard students
in their practices; and held individual meetings with others across Harvard’s campus. We continued to work
with the University and College institutional research oces to further analyze the data available from
student surveys.
Our findings and recommendations are summarized in the document that follows. While our charge was to
investigate the mental health of students, we note that Harvard should examine the mental health of its sta
and faculty. Students learn habits of work, thought, and balance from faculty, and student mental health has
clearly been aected by the practices and visible stresses of their professors. In addition, we note that while
we focus largely on the environment for students at Harvard, we do so with full awareness that Harvard does
not exist in a vacuum. Rates of anxiety, depression, and other mental health conditions are rising nationally,
among both college students and young adults as a whole. Students across the country are facing structural
realities dramatically dierent from those experienced by previous cohorts. The costs of higher education
and housing have soared. The planet has warmed dramatically, and the economic, environmental, and social
consequences, now too numerous and too frequent to ignore, have dimmed the aspirations of many who will
be forced to deal with the repercussions over their lifetimes. The academic labor market has changed, and
while the number of Ph.D.’s has risen dramatically, the number of tenure-track job openings in many fields
has shrunk.
3
The changing immigration policy landscape in the U.S. and other countries has unsettled many
students and their families. And students were facing all these conditions before the world was forced to
confront its worst pandemic nearly a century.
We had concluded most of our work, and were drafting our recommendations, when COVID-19 hit. It is clear to
us that the dramatic disruptions to social life created by the pandemic will aect, and in some cases worsen,
the problems we have identified. Economic stress, high unemployment, social isolation, loss of life, and many
other conditions produce grief, stress, loneliness, despair, and more. The University has and must continue to
respond, both in the short term and in the long term. At the same time, changing the work of this Task Force
to address the specific impacts of COVID-19 would not be sensible. Our Task Force is ill-equipped for that
objective, as our membership is large and comprehensive, and not designed to address a major, unexpected,
quickly changing crisis requiring rapid response. Thus, we have not altered our recommendations to become
COVID-19 response actions. Nevertheless, we believe that our recommendations will prove essential for the
University to implement as part of any response, not only to help understand the landscape in which the crisis
reached us, but also to inform how to take the steps needed to return to some measure of normality.
In what follows, we first describe what we learned about the state of mental health among undergraduates
and among graduate students and professional students. In both cases, we summarize what we learned
about the basic state of aairs, including recent changes in mental health indicators, the range of issues
that students are facing, and the conditions that seem to be aecting mental health. Next, we describe in
more detail the clinical resources available at Harvard, including how much students know about—and what
they think of—these resources. Finally, we list our recommendations for action. Our recommendations were
culled from a large set of ideas generated by the many constituents we spoke to, after extensive discussions
of feasibility, likely impact, and possible unintended consequences. Several ideas that appeared to be
promising did not make the final cut, as they required further study.
4
Indeed, it became clear to us that
addressing student mental health requires a more sustained eort than a task force can undertake, and our
recommendations chart a path for that eort to take place.
Our discussions, interviews, and focus groups with students, faculty, sta, and many others have convinced
us that the University can make great strides on mental health. Indeed, strong mental self-care is essential to
the long-term success we hope for all our students. We have been inspired by the community’s response—the
collective will to build and sustain an environment of mental health that is flourishing, strong, broad-based,
and already being mobilized. After COVID-19, we are certain that the resolve is even greater. We hope our work
can help the Harvard community build on that enthusiasm and resolve for years to come.
3 Carey, Kevin. “The Bleak Job Landscape of Adjunctopia for PhDs” New York Times. March, 2020. https://www.nytimes.
com/2020/03/05/upshot/academic-job-crisis-phd.html
4 These ideas are listed in Appendix A