knowledge of poetry and my own writing. So, I decided to write a collection of poetry exploring
various poetic forms.
Ideally, I would have experimented with every poetic form in existence. Due to time
constraints, I decided to focus on nine unique forms: the acrostic, blackout poetry, the clerihew,
the ghazal, rimas dissolutas, the sestina, sijo, the sonnet and syllabic verse. From Korea to Arabia
to the United States, these forms come from a variety of cultures and poetic traditions. Their
origins date to unique time periods, ranging from the acrostic’s emergence in Ancient Greece to
blackout poetry’s much more recent appearance in the 2000’s. In addition to these forms, I also
explored the traditional meter of common measure. Please note that from now on when I use the
word “form,” I will be referring to both the aforementioned poetic forms and common measure,
even though it is not technically a form itself.
This semester, I read poems written in each of these forms, wrote my own poems, and
then discussed them with my thesis director, Dr. Arthur Smith, and my second reader, Dr. Marcel
Brouwers. During the process, I was primarily concerned with learning about the characteristics,
advantages, and disadvantages of each poetic form. I thought that by exploring these
fundamental elements I might gain greater insight into what draws poets to these particular
forms.
Before I discuss what I have learned from this process, I will explain what I consider to
be the biggest flaw in my thesis’s approach to poetic form. In order to give myself a sense of
structure, I chose to spend 1-2 weeks focusing on each form. In other words, I wrote poems in
only one style during each time period. Because I approached each poem with a specific form in
mind, my approach was somewhat unnatural. I think some of the poems feel forced into a given
style as a result. For two of these poems, “the stay-at-home skeptic” and “The Desert, My Father