Lesson 38
3 Nephi 12–15
This is one of the longer sets of notes, but even so I have left
a great deal unexplored. There is a great deal of material in
these chapters.
3 Nephi 12
Verse 1: Why does Jesus describe those he calls as minis-
ters and servants? What sense does it make to tell people
that they should pay attention to their servants? What is
going on here?
Verses 1–2: Why are those who have not seen and heard
more blessed than those who have?
Verse 3: This begins the parallel version of the Sermon on
the Mount. It may help you to read the two versions of the
sermon side by side. Sometimes the footnotes in Matthew
will also help you understand the version of the sermon
we have in 3 Nephi. What is the advantage of having two
almost identical accounts in scripture?
When Jesus delivers the sermon as Matthew reports it, the
setting is important to our understanding of it. Matthew
4:23 tells us, “Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their
synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom.
Then Matthew 5–7 tells us the gospel that he preached.
As Matthew tells the story, Jesus seems deliberately to give
the Sermon on the Mount in a way that compares him to
Lesson 38
287
Moses: he goes up on a mountain and delivers a new”
law for a multitude who are gathered at the base of the
mountain waiting for his return.
What is the setting in the Book of Mormon, and how might
it make the Nephites understand it differently than did
those in Galilee? In Matthew, the Sermon on the Mount
is partly a response to the Pharisaic focus on the law of
Moses. To what Nephite problem or problems might the
sermon in Zarahemla be a response?
Arthur Bassett has pointed out that we can understand
verse 3 as a repetition of verse 2, as a kind of summary of
the gospel. In that case, it isn’t one of the Beatitudes, and
the next verses, which are the Beatitudes, have a chiastic
pattern with mercy at its center:
A They that mourn shall be comforted (verse 4)
B The meek shall inherit the earth (verse 5)
C Those who hunger and thirst for righteous-
ness will be filled with the Holy Ghost (verse 6)
D The merciful will obtain mercy (verse 7)
C' The pure in heart will see God (verse 8)
B' Peacemakers will be the children of God (verse 9)
A' Those who are persecuted for righteousness will
receive a great reward, the kingdom of heaven (verses
10–12)
If you think that Bassett’s understanding of how these verses
are related to each other is plausible, why might the beati-
tudes center on mercy? Why would mercy be an important
THE BOOK OF MORMON MADE HARDER: SCRIPTURE STUDY QUESTIONS
288
lesson for the Nephites? Have recent events made the neces-
sity of mercy clear? Which ones in particular, and how do
they do that?
Verse 3: What are other words that mean the same as
blessed?
What does it mean to be poor in spirit? It cannot mean
that one has a spirit that is poor or wanting, so what does it
mean? In the King James translation of the Bible (KJV), the
phrase “theirs is the kingdom of heaven translates a Greek
phrase that could also be translated “the kingdom of heaven
belongs to them. If we understood the phrase that way
here, would it give any additional meaning to the verse?
Verse 4: Compare this verse to Isaiah 61:2.
Verse 5: Who are the meek? In verses 39–42, the Savior will
give examples of meekness. Note, too, that this verse is a
quotation of Psalm 37:11. Why would Jesus quote from the
Old Testament so much in this explication of his gospel?
Verse 6: What false understandings of righteousness have
the Nephite and Lamanite prophets had to deal with? What
does Jesus teach about righteousness? Where, specifically,
do you find a Book of Mormon explanation of what it
means to be righteous? The word translated “righteous-
ness in the KJV translation of Matthew could also be
translated “justice. Does that also make sense as a way of
understanding righteousness here? Why or why not?
Verse 7: What does mercy mean? What does it take to be
merciful? How are the requirement to be righteous (verse
6) and the requirement to be merciful related to each
other?
Lesson 38
289
Verse 8: The word translated “pure in the KJV could also
have been translated cleansed. Is that relevant? What does
it mean to have a pure heart? What does it mean to see
God? Where do we see God?
Verse 9: Whom do you think Jesus has in mind when he
speaks of the peacemakers? (Does this have anything to
do with 3 Nephi 11:28?) Do verses 21–26 give us an idea
of what he means? What does it mean that the peacemak-
ers will be called the children of God? Arent we already his
children? Why might Jesus have associated being a peace-
maker with being a child of God?
Verses 11: We can see a division in the sermon at verse 11:
the Beatitudes (verses 4–10) give us the general descrip-
tion of the gospel, and the verses that follow expand on that
general description.
Verses 13–16: Do verses 13 and 14 teach the same thing,
or does each teach something different? Compare 3 Nephi
18:24 to verses 15–16; verse 16 seems to explain the other
verses in this group. What does verse 16 teach us about
good works?
Verses 17–20: What does it mean to say that Jesus did
not come to annul the law? How does verse 19 explain
the purpose of law? Does that explain why law cannot
save us—why an atonement was required? Verse 20 tells
us that obedience is required. How does that fit with the
definition of his doctrine that the Savior gave in 3 Nephi
11:31–35, where obedience wasn’t mentioned and where
the Savior said that nothing more could be added to his
doctrine (3 Nephi 11:40)?
THE BOOK OF MORMON MADE HARDER: SCRIPTURE STUDY QUESTIONS
290
Verses 21–26: Jesus seems to me to be giving examples of
what he meant when he spoke of peacemakers in verse 9.
Verses 22: Notice that the Book of Mormon and the JST
omit “without a cause (Matthew 5:22 KJV) in verse 22—
as do almost all Greek manuscripts. How does that change
our understanding of the verse?
In verse 22, the word raca means the same thing as the
Greek word translated “fool” at the end of the verse. It
isnt any stronger than the kinds of things we sometimes
say to each other when we are angry, such as “You idiot!”
What does Jesus mean, then, when he says (paraphrasing),
“Whoever calls his brother a fool is in danger of the com-
munity’s judgment, but whoever says ‘You fool’ is in danger
of hellfire”? Does it make a difference that the first case is
about anger towards a brother and no one is specified in
the second? What is the point of verses 21–22?
Verses 23–24: What is Jesus saying about reconciliation?
Is it more or less important than worship? Notice that we
begin with the prohibition of murder in verse 21, move to
the prohibition of anger in verse 22, and find a prohibi-
tion of hard feelings in verse 23. We would usually begin
with the least serious problem and work our way up to
the most serious. Why do you think the Savior reverses
the normal order?
Verses 25–26: Can you think of particular adversaries that
Jesus might have in mind in verses 25–26? How do these
examples apply to us?
Verses 27–28: In Galilee, these verses were directed at the
Pharisees and their insistence on the formalities of the
Lesson 38
291
Mosaic law. To whom do you think the verses would ap-
ply among the Nephites?
Verses 29–30: Jesus is obviously speaking hyperbolically.
What is the point of his hyperbole? Does he here give us a
definition of what it means to take up ones cross?
Verses 31–32: The scripture to which Jesus refers (Deu-
teronomy 24:1) is unclear about the grounds for divorce.
It says that a man can put away his wife if he finds some-
thing shameful in her (“some uncleanness” in the King
James translation). In Galilee this was the basis for a major
debate about the grounds for divorce. How might these
words have been relevant to the Nephites? How are they
relevant to us? It isn’t easy to understand the exception
that Jesus allows here because in the KJV it isn’t clear what
Matthew means by the word translated “fornication. The
Greek word that Matthew uses literally means prostitu-
tion. How do you understand these verses?
Verses 33–37: The part of the law that Jesus has in mind
here seems to be that found in places such as Exodus 20:7,
Leviticus 19:12, Numbers 30:3, and Deuteronomy 23:22.
How might the teaching in these verses have applied to the
Nephites? Can you think of specific problems to which this
would have been a response? How does it apply to us?
Verses 38–42: It appears that in the Mosaic law “an eye for
an eye was not a directive as to how much punishment to
inflict, but a limitation on the retribution one could seek:
if someone puts out your eye, you have no right to demand
more than the recompense for that eye.
THE BOOK OF MORMON MADE HARDER: SCRIPTURE STUDY QUESTIONS
292
A more accurate translation of the first part of Matthew
5:39 might be resist not the one who troubles you [or the
one who defies you]. Would that also be a reasonable way
to understand the first part of verse 39 here? What do these
verses teach us about how we are to respond to physical
violence? How does this teaching compare to what we find
in D&C 98:16–48? How does it compare to the way that the
Book of Mormon prophets dealt with violence?
What do these verses teach us about how we should deal
with others in legal contention? The demand of verse 41 is
one dictated by Roman law: a Roman soldier could compel
others to carry his baggage a mile, so the general topic seems
to be something like “the demands of the government. How
would the Nephites have understood this verse?
What do these verses teach us about how we should re-
spond to the demands of those who oppress us? Compare
verse 42 to Mosiah 4:16–23. What obligation is Jesus giv-
ing us in verse 42?
Verses 43–47: The Old Testament teaches that we must love
our neighbor. (See Leviticus 19:18.) But nowhere does it
teach that we should hate our enemies. How do you think
this idea of hating ones enemies became part of the under-
standing of the commandment to love our neighbors? What
particular enemies does verse 44 suggest Jesus had in mind?
What reason does verse 45 give for loving our enemies?
What does verse 45 suggest that it means to be one of God’s
children? Why might these verses have been even more im-
portant to the Nephites than they were to the Jews?
Lesson 38
293
Verse 48: This verse marks a significant break in the ser-
mon, the culmination to this point. As such, perhaps we
should understand it as a restatement of verse 3. Can you
think of ways in which those verses mean the same? In the
corresponding verse in Matthew, notice the footnote that
explains what the word perfect means: whole, complete,
finished, developed. A better translation of the Matthew
verse might be: “Be ye therefore whole, even as your Father
in heaven is whole. Does that tell us anything about how
to understand this verse?
I believe that Jesus may be quoting or paraphrasing Leviti-
cus 19:2 here: “Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am
holy. What does it mean to be holy? The Hebrew word in
Leviticus means “sacred” or set apart. Does that help us
understand what it means to be holy? To be whole?
James speaks of the double-minded person (James 1:8).
What does it mean to be double minded? In contrast, what
does it mean to be whole?
Can we be whole in this life? If not, then why has Jesus
commanded us to be whole?
Is wholeness something that pertains only to myself—I
must be undivided—or is it something that also pertains
to my relation with others, including God—my relations
with others must be whole? What would it mean for a rela-
tion not to be whole?
How does the Sermon on the Mount teach us to be per-
fect, or whole? Assuming that the chiasm we saw in verses
4–12 is accurate, does it suggest anything about how we
are to be perfect? Is it possible to use the concept of mercy
THE BOOK OF MORMON MADE HARDER: SCRIPTURE STUDY QUESTIONS
294
to restate or rethink each of the specific discussions that
we saw in verses 11–47? What does mercy have to do with
wholeness or perfection?
3 Nephi 13
Verses 1–7: Joseph Smith said, “I have a key by which I un-
derstand the scriptures. I enquire, what was the question
which drew out the answer, or caused Jesus to utter the par-
able? . . . To ascertain its meaning, we must dig up the root
and ascertain what it was that drew the saying out of Jesus”
(History of the Church, 5:261–62). Though that is a method
of interpreting parables, presumably the same principle
applies to other teachings. The corresponding verses in
Matthew answered particular questions that the saints in
the areas of Jerusalem and Galilee had to deal with. What
Nephite questions do they answer? Did these verses mean
something different for the Nephites than they did for the
Jews?
We probably have no difficulty condemning the behavior
described in verses 1–2, but do we have difficulty living the
principle taught in verses 3–4? What obstacles do we face in
that regard? The teaching in these verses seems, on the sur-
face, to conflict with the teaching in 3 Nephi 5:14–16, but
since both are the teachings of the Savior, we must assume
that they do not. How would you explain these teachings so
that they do not conflict?
Verses 3–4, 5–6: These two proscriptions are parallel. Why do
you think that is so? Against what is Jesus warning in them?
To whom is he referring when he speaks of “the heathen”?
Lesson 38
295
Verses 8–9: Verse 8 tells us that the Father knows before we
ask what we need. Verse 9 says therefore we should pray in
the manner to be described. Why does the Father’s knowl-
edge of our needs mean that we should pray in that way?
Verses 9–13: Compare this version of the Lord’s Prayer to
the version in Matthew 6:9–13, noting the differences (dif-
ferences that remain if you compare the Joseph Smith revi-
sion of the Bible with the Book of Mormon).
What does it mean to pray that the Father’s name will be
hallowed, in other words, holy? Why is the phrase “thy
kingdom come missing from this prayer, though we see it
in the Matthew version? Why is the prayer for daily bread
missing in the Book of Mormon version of the prayer?
How are sins like debts?
What does this verse say about the connection between our
relation to others and our salvation?
Why does the Lord speak of the Father leading us into
temptation in both versions of the prayer?
Paraphrased, verse 13 says “because the kingdom, the
power, and the glory belong to thee forever. How does the
word for (“because”) connect the final part of the prayer to
the rest? Does it relate only back to the immediately previ-
ous verse—forgive us as we forgive our debtors because the
kingdom, power, and glory belong to thee forever—or does
it relate back to something else?
Verses 14–15: Why does the Savior add this commentary
on the prayer? Why is the only part of the prayer on which
he comments the part about forgiveness?
THE BOOK OF MORMON MADE HARDER: SCRIPTURE STUDY QUESTIONS
296
Verses 16–18: Notice the parallel between these verses and
verses 3–4 and 5–6. What do you make of that parallel? The
Lord addresses signs of mourning and repentance that come
from the early part of the Old Testament, and he seems to be
saying, “You must go beyond these. How would a person go
beyond them? Is there anything similar in our own worship?
What would it be, and how would we go beyond it?
Verses 19–23: Only righteousness results in anything of
lasting value, and what we treasure tells us what we value.
What is the Lord teaching here about righteousness? Do
these verses help us understand better whom he was speak-
ing of in 3 Nephi 12:6 when he spoke of those who hunger
and thirst after righteousness?
Verses 24–34: Verse 24 provides a transition to a new theme:
we cannot serve both God and possessions (Mammon).
Verses 25–31 give various examples of what that means: we
need not take thought for ourselves and our provisions be-
cause God will provide.
The Greek translated as “take no thought in the KJV might
be better translated don’t be anxious or dont worry.
Does that change your understanding of these verses and
what Jesus commands?
President John Taylor once taught that these verses do
not apply to people generally, but to those who serve in
the church through the priesthood (Hyrum M. Smith and
Janne M. Sjodahl, Doctrine and Covenants Commentary,
rev. ed. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1965], 462–63). How
do they apply to them? How does verse 33 explain verses
24–32?
Lesson 38
297
What does “Sufficient is the day unto the evil thereof
(verse 34) mean? It isn’t a quotation from scripture but
seems to be a Jewish proverb of Jesus’s time. What could it
have meant to the Nephites who probably didn’t have the
same proverb? What does it mean to us?
3 Nephi 14
Verses 1–5: When are we guilty of the kind of judgment
of which Jesus speaks here? Notice that though the Mat-
thew text and the 3 Nephi text are very similar here, they
are both quite different from the text in the Joseph Smith
Translation. (For some of the differences, see page 802 in
your Bible.) How do you explain that?
Verse 6: What is Jesus teaching here? When would we be
giving holy things to the dogs or casting our pearls before
swine? How do we avoid doing so?
Verses 7–11: The Lord’s Prayer in Matthew keeps petition
to only one line (daily bread) while the version of 3 Nephi
omits it altogether. Here, however, we see that we are com-
manded to petition for our needs. Is there a contradiction
between the Lord’s Prayer and these verses? Explain what
you think. If the Father already knows our needs (3 Nephi
12: 8, 32), why should we petition at all? In verse 11, Jesus
calls those to whom he speaks evil. Is he being hyperbolic?
Why does he use that term?
Verse 12: This is one version of the Golden Rule. Can a
person who is not pure in heart use the Golden Rule as an
accurate standard of his conduct? What problem might he
encounter using it?
THE BOOK OF MORMON MADE HARDER: SCRIPTURE STUDY QUESTIONS
298
Verses 13–14: Remember that the word strait means “nar-
row”: the gate leading to destruction is wide and the road
to destruction is spacious, but the gate leading to life—
eternal life—is narrow. What does it mean to say that few
find the strait gate?
Verses 15–20: We can recognize prophets by their fruits.
Notice that verse 19 is a word-for-word repetition of John
the Baptists teaching (Matthew 3:10). Does it make any
difference that those in Galilee would probably have recog-
nized that Jesus was speaking of John, while those in Zara-
hemla almost certainly would not? Why was this teaching
particularly important in Jesus’s time? How is it important
to us today? Where do we encounter false prophets?
Verses 21–23: To whom is Jesus referring when he speaks
of those who say “Lord, Lord” to him? Of those who
prophesy in his name? Of those who do miracles in his
name? Why would some who did these things be excluded
from his presence? How can prophesying in Jesuss name
and working miracles be iniquitous? Do any of the teach-
ings that have come before this in the sermon answer that
question?
Verses 24–27: What does it mean to hear the sayings of
Christ and do them? What does it mean to hear them and
not do them? As the Lord gives this parable, what do build-
ing on rock and building on sand have to do with doing
and not doing? How do these verses relate to Deuteronomy
6:4–9? How do they relate to 3 Nephi 14:21–23?
Lesson 38
299
3 Nephi 15
Verse 2: The Nephites respond to this sermon by wonder-
ing about the passing of the law of Moses. How was the
response in Galilee different? Do those differences tell us
anything about the two groups of people?
Verse 8: What specifically is Christ referring to when he says
“the law which was given unto Moses”? Are the Ten Com-
mandments part of that law? How do we know what has
been fulfilled and what hasnt? What covenant was made
that has not been completely fulfilled?
The word end has various meanings, including cessation
of existence, “final destination, and purpose. Which
meaning do you think the Lord means when he says “the
law . . . hath an end in me”?
Verse 9: What does the Savior mean when he says, “I am
the law, and the light”? How is he, a person, the law? How
is that different from the law of Moses? What does he mean
when he says, “Look unto me”? How do we look unto him?
What is the significance of that metaphor?
Verse 11: What does this suggest about whom the Lord has
been speaking to up to this point?
Verses 14–24: Why do you think the Father didn’t want
those in Jerusalem to know about those on these conti-
nents or the other tribes”? He says it is because of iniquity,
but how does that explain it? Does this mean that even the
apostles did not know? Does verse 18 also describe them?
THE BOOK OF MORMON MADE HARDER: SCRIPTURE STUDY QUESTIONS
300