14
UNIVERSITY REVIEW OF REPORTS
Whenever the university receives a report of sexual
assault, intimate partner violence, or stalking, it will review
that report consistent with its applicable policies and
procedures.
In all cases, the university’s policies and procedures seek
to provide a prompt, fair, and impartial resolution of the
concern reported. To that end, the individuals responsible
for handling sexual violence, intimate partner violence,
and stalking investigations, sanctioning, and appeals
receive annual training on how to properly conduct their
investigations and hearings of these concerns in a way
that promotes accountability as well as the safety of the
individuals involved, and of the university community as a
whole. The university investigation processes for reviewing
sexual violence, intimate partner violence, and stalking*
use a preponderance of the evidence standard.
In addition, these processes permit the complainant,
respondent, or witness to have an adviser of their choice
to provide support and guidance throughout the process.
The adviser may assist with all written submissions made
by a complainant or a respondent and attend any meeting
or hearing throughout the process. During any meeting,
the adviser is present to observe and provide support and
counsel to the participant. The adviser may not testify or
obstruct the meeting. In a hearing, the adviser will conduct
a cross-examination on behalf of the party. If a party does
not have an adviser of their choice present at a hearing, the
university will without fee or charge to the party provide an
adviser of the university’s choice, for the limited purpose
of conducting cross-examination on behalf of that party.
A party may request to consult with their adviser at any
point. However, except for the limited role of asking the
other party and witnesses relevant questions, the adviser
may not otherwise participate actively in the hearing and
may not speak or otherwise communicate on the part of
the advisee.
The university’s processes also provide that the complainant
and respondent will receive written notication of the
outcome of any disciplinary proceeding relating to the
reported concern, as well as of any opportunities to
appeal the results of that proceeding, any changes to the
results before they are nalized, and an update when the
results become nal. The university also recognizes the
importance of maintaining, to the greatest extent possible,
the condentiality of both the claimant’s and respondent’s
identities while it reviews the reported concern. To that
end, the university will share information internally only as
needed to ensure proper handling of the concerns that have
been raised, comply with legal obligations, or provide any
requested supportive measures, and will share information
externally only to the extent legally required to do so; the
university does not publish the identities of claimants in its
crime alerts or crime logs.
*This Policy addresses stalking on the basis of sex or gender.
The Title IX Coordinator will determine if the reported conduct
meets these criteria. Stalking behavior by students that does
not meet these criteria may be addressed under the Statement
of Student Rights and Responsibilities as harassment using
a preponderance of the evidence standard. Alleged stalking
behavior by a faculty or staff member, or a third party may be
addressed under the violence in the University Community Policy,
SPG 601.18