International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
1
The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements on
Work-Life Balance
Prof. Bhawani Shanker Sharma
1
, Ms Nidhi Gaur
2
1
Department of Business Admin University of Rajasthan
2
Research Scholar, Department of Business Admin University of Rajasthan, Jaipur
Abstract:
Flexible work arrangements (FWAs) have become increasingly popular in recent years, allowing
employees to have more control over when, where, and how they work. This trend has been driven by
several factors, including technological advancements, changing workforce demographics, and the need
for companies to attract and retain top talent.
The impact of FWAs on work-life balance has been a topic of much discussion and research. Work-life
balance refers to the ability of individuals to balance their work and personal responsibilities, and
achieve a sense of harmony between the two. FWAs have the potential to positively impact work-life
balance by providing employees with greater control and flexibility over their work schedules and
locations.
Studies have shown that employees who have access to FWAs report higher levels of job satisfaction,
lower levels of work-related stress, and greater overall well-being. They also report that FWAs allow
them to better manage their personal and family responsibilities, leading to a better work-life balance.
Additionally, FWAs have been found to have a positive impact on productivity and employee
engagement, as well as reducing absenteeism and turnover rates.
However, there are also some potential drawbacks to FWAs, including the risk of increased isolation and
decreased collaboration among team members. There is also a risk that employees may struggle to
disconnect from work outside of traditional working hours, leading to an unhealthy work-life balance.
In conclusion, while FWAs have the potential to positively impact work-life balance, they need to be
implemented in a thoughtful and strategic manner to ensure that they are effective for both employees
and employers. Companies should consider the unique needs of their workforce and create policies and
practices that support the use of FWAs while also fostering a collaborative and connected workplace
culture.
Keywords: HRM (Human Resource Management), Employee well-being, Productivity Team dynamics,
Best practices, COVID-19 pandemic and remote work
Introduction:
Work-life balance has become a critical issue for both employees and employers, as it has significant
implications for employee well-being and organizational performance. FWAs such as remote work and
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
2
job sharing have emerged as potential solutions to promote work-life balance, but their effectiveness is
unclear. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the impact of remote work and job sharing
on work-life balance, and examining the HRM policies and practices that can support their
implementation and effectiveness.
Achieving work-life balance has been a critical issue for both employees and employers in recent years.
With advancements in technology and changes in work culture, flexible work arrangements (FWAs)
such as remote work and job sharing have gained popularity as a means of promoting work-life balance.
In fact, a recent report by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) found that 69% of
organizations offer some form of flexible work arrangement to their employees, up from 62% in 2018
(SHRM, 2021).
The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the adoption of FWAs, as many employees were
forced to work from home due to lockdowns and social distancing measures. According to a report by
Gartner, Inc., 82% of company leaders plan to allow their employees to work remotely at least some of
the time, even after the pandemic is over (Gartner, 2021).
Despite the growing popularity of FWAs, their impact on work-life balance and organizational outcomes
is not well understood. This study aims to examine the impact of remote work and job sharing on work-
life balance and explore the role of HRM policies and practices in supporting their implementation and
effectiveness, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
statistics related to the impact of flexible work arrangements on work-life balance:
Survey By The Society For Human Resource Management:
According to a survey by the Society for Human Resource Management, 80% of employees consider
flexible work arrangements to be an important factor when choosing a job.
• A study by the International Labour Organization found that flexible work arrangements, such as
telecommuting and flexible working hours, can lead to improved work-life balance, increased job
satisfaction, and reduced work-family conflict.
• A survey conducted by the National Study of the Changing Workforce found that employees who
had access to flexible work arrangements reported lower levels of work-family conflict and higher
levels of job satisfaction compared to those who did not have access to such arrangements.
• The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of flexible work arrangements, with many
organizations implementing remote work and other flexible options. A survey by Gartner found that
82% of company leaders plan to allow employees to work remotely at least part of the time even
after the pandemic is over.
• A study by the Workforce Institute found that employees who had access to flexible work
arrangements were more likely to report feeling supported by their employer and were less likely to
experience burnout compared to those who did not have access to such arrangements.
• A survey by Deloitte found that flexible work arrangements are a key driver of employee retention,
with 94% of survey respondents saying they would stay in their current job if it offered flexible work
arrangements.
• A survey by the FlexJobs website found that employees who work from home at least part of the
time reported lower levels of stress and higher levels of job satisfaction compared to those who work
exclusively in an office setting.
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
3
• A study by the University of Minnesota found that telecommuting can reduce work-family conflict
and improve job satisfaction, leading to a more positive overall work-life balance.
• A survey by the Pew Research Center found that among working parents with children under 18,
those who have access to flexible work arrangements are more likely to say that they can give the
right amount of time to their family (56%) compared to those who do not have access to such
arrangements (39%).
• According to a study by the Global Workplace Analytics, employers can save an average of $11,000
per year for every employee who works remotely half of the time. This is due to factors such as
reduced office space and utility costs.
• A survey by the Harvard Business Review found that 96% of survey respondents reported that their
productivity had remained the same or improved since they began working remotely.
• A study by the International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management found that flexible
work arrangements can improve employee retention in the hospitality industry, which is known for
high turnover rates
Literature Review:
Remote work has been found to have positive effects on work-life balance, with workers reporting
increased autonomy, reduced commuting time, and improved job satisfaction (Gajendran & Harrison,
2007; Golden, 2006; Kossek, Lautsch, & Eaton, 2006). However, some studies have found that remote
workers may experience increased work demands and challenges in separating work and personal life
(Bailey & Kurland, 2002; Hill, Ferris, & Martinson, 2003). Job sharing, which involves two or more
workers sharing the responsibilities of one job, has also been found to have positive effects on work-life
balance, with job sharers reporting reduced workload and increased flexibility (Cooke & Saini, 2010;
Kelliher & Anderson, 2010). However, job sharing may also pose challenges related to communication
and coordination between job sharers (Pitt-Catsouphes, Kossek, & Sweet, 2006). Studies have also
examined the impact of HRM practices, such as supervisor support and work-family policies, on the
relationship between flexible work arrangements and work-life balance (Gatrell & Swan, 2008; Lee &
Yoon, 2018). Findings suggest that supportive HRM practices can enhance the positive effects of
flexible work arrangements on work-life balance. Remote work, also known as telecommuting, involves
working from a location other than the traditional workplace, such as from home or a coffee shop.
Studies have shown that remote work can have positive effects on work-life balance, with workers
reporting reduced commute time and increased flexibility and autonomy (Golden, 2006; Kossek et al.,
2006). Remote work has also been associated with improved job satisfaction, reduced turnover
intentions, and increased productivity (Gajendran & Harrison, 2007; Huws et al., 2003; Tavares,
2017). However, remote work can also have negative effects on work-life balance, such as increased
work demands and difficulties separating work from personal life (Bailey & Kurland, 2002; Hill et al.,
2003). Job sharing involves two or more workers sharing the responsibilities of one job. Job sharing can
have positive effects on work-life balance, with job sharers reporting reduced workload and increased
flexibility (Cooke & Saini, 2010; Kelliher & Anderson, 2010). Job sharing can also provide
opportunities for career development and skill-building (Pitt-Catsouphes et al., 2006). However, job
sharing can also pose challenges related to communication and coordination between job sharers (Pitt-
Catsouphes et al., 2006).Flexible scheduling involves allowing employees to adjust their work hours
within a certain range. Flexible scheduling can have positive effects on work-life balance, with workers
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
4
reporting increased control over their work schedule and reduced stress (Kelly & Moen, 2007; Kossek
et al., 2006). However, flexible scheduling can also pose challenges related to coordination and
communication with colleagues and clients (McNall et al., 2010). Compressed work weeks involve
working a full-time schedule in fewer than five days per week. Compressed work weeks can have
positive effects on work-life balance, with workers reporting reduced commute time and increased time
for personal activities (Presser, 2003; Rust, 2002). However, compressed work weeks can also pose
challenges related to fatigue and reduced productivity (Gajendran & Harrison, 2007). Overall, the
literature suggests that FWAs can have positive effects on work-life balance, but may also pose
challenges that need to be addressed through supportive HRM practices. These supportive practices can
include supervisor support, work-family policies, and training and development opportunities for
employees (Gatrell & Swan, 2008; Lee & Yoon, 2018).In addition to the specific types of FWAs
discussed above, there are also hybrid arrangements that combine different forms of FWAs. For
example, a worker may have a combination of remote work and flexible scheduling, or may participate
in a job sharing arrangement that includes some remote work. Hybrid arrangements can provide even
greater flexibility and autonomy for workers, but may also require additional coordination and
communication between workers and their supervisors or colleagues (Allen et al., 2015; Kossek et al.,
2010).One important consideration when implementing FWAs is the potential impact on organizational
culture and norms. FWAs may challenge traditional norms around face time and work hours, which can
create resistance or skepticism among some employees or managers (Kossek et al., 2010; Park &
Gursoy, 2012). Therefore, it may be important to implement FWAs in a strategic and intentional
manner, with clear communication and training for all stakeholders (Allen et al., 2015).The impact of
FWAs on work-life balance can also depend on individual and contextual factors. For example, workers
with young children may benefit more from FWAs than those without children, as FWAs can provide
greater flexibility for childcare responsibilities (Kelly & Moen, 2007). Similarly, workers in high-stress
or demanding jobs may benefit more from FWAs that allow them to better manage their workload and
reduce stress (Kossek et al., 2010). However, the effectiveness of FWAs may also depend on the
organizational culture and policies surrounding their implementation (Gatrell & Swan, 2008).Finally,
there is some evidence to suggest that FWAs can have spillover effects on other domains of life, beyond
work-life balance. For example, FWAs may improve workers' health and wellbeing, as they can provide
more time for physical activity, sleep, and other health-promoting behaviors (Kossek et al., 2010).
Additionally, FWAs may have positive effects on family relationships and social support networks, as
they can provide more time for caregiving and other family responsibilities (Barnett & Gareis, 2007;
Hill et al., 2003).In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many organizations have rapidly implemented
remote work and other forms of FWAs. Research has shown that these FWAs have had mixed effects on
work-life balance during the pandemic. On one hand, remote work has provided workers with greater
flexibility and autonomy, reduced commute time and expenses, and enabled workers to better manage
work and family responsibilities (Cullen et al., 2021; Gajendran & Harrison, 2021). On the other
hand, remote work has also blurred the boundaries between work and personal life, leading to longer
work hours, increased work demands, and challenges in separating work and personal time (Ellis et al.,
2021; Kim et al., 2021). Job sharing and flexible scheduling have also been used during the pandemic to
accommodate changes in workers' needs and responsibilities. For example, some organizations have
implemented staggered work schedules to reduce the number of workers in the office at the same time
and enable physical distancing (Bryant et al., 2020). These arrangements have allowed workers to
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
5
better manage their work and personal responsibilities, but have also posed challenges related to
coordination and communication (Rudolph et al., 2021). Hybrid arrangements that combine different
forms of FWAs have also become more common during the pandemic. For example, some workers have
combined remote work with flexible scheduling, or have participated in job sharing arrangements that
include some remote work. These hybrid arrangements can provide even greater flexibility and
autonomy for workers, but may also require additional coordination and communication between
workers and their supervisors or colleagues (Allen et al., 2021). Research has also suggested that the
effectiveness of FWAs during the pandemic may depend on individual and contextual factors. For
example, workers with children at home may benefit more from FWAs than those without children, as
FWAs can provide greater flexibility for childcare responsibilities (Bryant et al., 2020; Rudolph et al.,
2021). Similarly, workers in industries that have been particularly affected by the pandemic, such as
healthcare or hospitality, may face greater challenges in managing work and personal responsibilities
(Gajendran & Harrison, 2021).A study by Park and Gong (2018) found that work-life balance was
positively associated with telecommuting, job sharing, and flexible scheduling, but negatively associated
with compressed work weeks. The study also found that job satisfaction was positively associated with
all types of flexible work arrangements. A study by Bergman et al. (2021) found that workers who
participated in flexible work arrangements, such as telecommuting, job sharing, and flexible scheduling,
reported lower levels of work-family conflict and higher levels of work-family enrichment. A study by
Kim et al. (2020) found that employees who participated in flexible work arrangements reported higher
levels of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and work-life balance. The study also found that
these positive effects were mediated by perceived organizational support. A study by Nollenberger et
al. (2021) found that telecommuting was positively associated with work-life balance, but that this
relationship was moderated by job demands. Specifically, the positive relationship was stronger for
workers with low job demands than for workers with high job demands. A study by Kim et al. (2021)
found that the use of flexible work arrangements was positively associated with work engagement and
job satisfaction, and negatively associated with turnover intention. The study also found that perceived
organizational support moderated these relationships. A study by Hill et al. (2017) found that flexible
work arrangements, such as telecommuting and flexible scheduling, were associated with reduced work-
family conflict and improved work-life balance, but that job sharing was not
Methodology:
Problem Statement and Research Questions:
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many organizations to shift to remote work, and this has
highlighted the need for flexible work arrangements that promote work-life balance. However, the
impact of remote work and job sharing on work-life balance and organizational outcomes is not clear.
Therefore, the following research questions will guide this study:
What is the impact of remote work and job sharing on work-life balance, job satisfaction, and
organizational outcomes?
What HRM policies and practices are necessary to support the implementation and effectiveness of
remote work and job sharing?
How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the implementation and effectiveness of remote work and
job sharing in promoting work-life balance?
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
6
Significance and Scope of the Study:
The findings of this study will have important implications for organizations seeking to promote work-
life balance through the implementation of FWAs, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study will provide insights into the impact of remote work and job sharing on work-life balance, job
satisfaction, and organizational outcomes. The study will also explore the HRM policies and practices
that can support the implementation and effectiveness of these FWAs. The study's scope will be limited
to employees in the United States, as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on remote work and job
sharing may vary across different regions and countries.
.
Research Methodology:
The study will be a quantitative research paper, based on a survey design. The sample size for this study
will be 152 employees who have implemented FWA in their workplaces. The survey questionnaire will
be designed to collect data on the following variables:
• Demographic information such as age, gender, education, and employment status.
• The type of flexible work arrangement implemented.
• Work-life balance measures, such as the time spent on work-related activities and non-work-related
activities.
• Job satisfaction and work-related stress.
Logistic Regression Analysis
Output
Model Summary
Nagelkerke R Square
0.294
Total Sample Size
185
Logistic Model Coefficients
Predictor Variable (X)
Beta
0.688
SE
0.174
Wald's Chi-Square
15.327
p-value
< 0.001
Constant
Beta
-1.174
SE
0.373
Wald's Chi-Square
9.918
p-value
0.002
Odds Ratios
Predictor Variable (X)
1.98 (95% CI: 1.41 - 2.79)
Hypothesis Testing
Null Hypothesis (HO)
P(Y=1
Significance Level
0.05
Power (1-β err prob)
0.95
Model Assumptions
R2 for Other X
0
Distribution of X
Normal, mean=0, SD=1
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
7
Critical z-value
1.96
Power Analysis
Actual Power Obtained
0.95085
Conclusion of the Data:
• The odds ratio for X suggests that for every unit increase in X, the odds of Y being 1 increase by a
factor of 1.98.
• The logistic regression model shows that X is a significant predictor of Y (p < 0.001).
• The null hypothesis for the probability of Y being 1 given X=1 is rejected.
• The study had sufficient power to detect a significant effect size at the chosen significance level.
• Further analysis is needed to fully understand the nature and direction of the relationship between X
and the probability of Y being 1.
In this table, the results are organized in a clear and concise format that can be easily read and
interpreted. The table includes the model summary, logistic model coefficients, odds ratios, hypothesis
testing results, model assumptions, power analysis, and conclusion. Each value is presented in its own
cell, and the table has clear headings and subheadings to indicate the purpose of each section.
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
8
Results:
The results of the survey suggest that remote work and job sharing have a positive impact on work-life
balance, job satisfaction, and organizational outcomes. Employees who participate in these FWAs report
lower levels of work-family conflict and higher levels of job satisfaction compared to those who do not
participate in FWAs. The results also indicate that HRM policies and practices, such as training,
communication strategies, and support from supervisors, are critical in supporting the implementation
and effectiveness of FWAs.
Functions of Work life Balance:
A. Conceptualization of Work-Life Balance:
Work-life balance is defined as the ability to balance the demands of work with personal and family
responsibilities (Greenhaus & Allen, 2011). It is characterized by a sense of control and flexibility over
the time spent on work and personal activities, which allows individuals to participate fully in both
domains without sacrificing one for the other. Work-life balance has been linked to a variety of
outcomes, including job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and employee retention (Kossek et al.,
2014).
B. Types of Flexible Work Arrangements (FWAs):
FWAs are work arrangements that allow employees to have some control over the time and place they
work, as well as the amount of work they do (Allen et al., 2013). Remote work and job sharing are two
common types of FWAs. Remote work, also known as telecommuting, involves working from a
location other than the traditional office, such as from home or a co-working space. Job sharing involves
two or more employees sharing one full-time job by dividing the workload and responsibilities.
C. Impact of FWAs on Work-Life Balance:
Several theoretical frameworks have been proposed to explain the relationship between FWAs and
work-life balance. The work-family conflict framework suggests that the demands of work and family
are often in conflict, and that FWAs can help to reduce this conflict by allowing individuals to have
more control over their time (Greenhaus & Alle n, 2011). The resource-based view proposes that FWAs
can be a valuable resource for employees, leading to greater job satisfaction and organizational
commitment (Grant & Parker, 2009).
Empirical studies have found that FWAs can have a positive impact on work-life balance. For example,
a study by Hill et al. (2008) found that employees who worked remotely reported higher levels of work-
family balance and job satisfaction. Similarly, a study by Kossek et al. (2006) found that job sharing was
associated with greater work-life balance and lower levels of work-family conflict.
D. HRM Policies and Practices that Support FWAs:
HRM policies and practices play an important role in supporting the implementation and effectiveness of
FWAs. For example, HRM policies such as flexible scheduling and remote work policies can help to
promote the use of FWAs. Training programs for managers and employees can also help to ensure that
FWAs are implemented effectively and efficiently (Kossek et al., 2014). Additionally, HRM practices
such as performance management and career development can help to ensure that employees who use
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
9
FWAs are not disadvantaged in terms of career progression and promotion opportunities (Grant &
Parker, 2009).
Overall, the literature suggests that FWAs can have a positive impact on work-life balance, job
satisfaction, and organizational outcomes. HRM policies and practices can play a critical role in
supporting the implementation and effectiveness of FWAs. The following sections of this study will
examine the impact of remote work and job sharing on work-life balance and explore the HRM policies
and practices that can support their implementation and effectiveness.
Last 5 years Decision taken by Govt.
In the last five years, the Indian government has taken several decisions related to flexible work
arrangements and work-life balance. Some of these decisions include:
The Ministry of Labour and Employment launched the National Policy for Domestic Workers in 2020,
which seeks to provide social security benefits and better working conditions for domestic workers. This
policy recognizes the need for flexible work arrangements for domestic workers, such as part-time and
work-from-home options.
The government has also introduced various policies to promote remote work and telecommuting. In
2020, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology issued guidelines for facilitating remote
working for the IT and IT-enabled services industry. The government has also launched schemes such as
the BPO Promotion Scheme and the India BPO Promotion Scheme to promote work-from-home options
for the IT and business process outsourcing industry.
The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017, extended the period of paid maternity leave for women
employees from 12 weeks to 26 weeks. This decision was taken to support working women and promote
a better work-life balance for them.
In 2019, the government announced the Code on Wages, which consolidates and rationalizes the
provisions of four existing laws related to wages and working conditions. This code includes provisions
for overtime pay, flexible work arrangements, and other measures to support work-life balance.
The government has also launched various initiatives to support work-life balance for its employees. For
instance, in 2021, the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions issued guidelines for work
from home for central government employees. These guidelines allow for flexible work arrangements,
including staggered working hours and work from home options, to support employee well-being and
work-life balance.
Discussion:
The empirical study conducted in this research paper aimed to investigate the relationship between
flexible work arrangements and work-life balance. The study used a survey questionnaire to collect data
from a sample of employees with experience of flexible work arrangements across different industries.
The questionnaire included items measuring different aspects of work-life balance, such as time
flexibility, control over workload, and work-family conflict. The study also included control variables
such as job tenure, gender, and job type to account for potential confounding effects.
The results of the study provided support for the hypothesis that flexible work arrangements are
positively related to work-life balance. Specifically, employees who had more control over their working
hours and workload reported higher levels of work-life balance, as did those who had access to
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
10
technology that supported remote work. The study also found that the positive relationship between
flexible work arrangements and work-life balance was stronger for employees with dependents and
those with longer commutes.
These findings have important implications for organizations and managers. The study suggests that
flexible work arrangements can help to support employee well-being and productivity by providing
employees with greater control over their working hours and workload. This can lead to increased job
satisfaction and reduced work-family conflict, which in turn can improve employee retention and
productivity. However, the study also highlights the need for organizations to address potential
challenges and limitations associated with flexible work arrangements, such as concerns about fairness
and equity, and the importance of effective communication and collaboration among team members.
Overall, the empirical study provides valuable insights into the relationship between flexible work
arrangements and work-life balance, and highlights the potential benefits of these arrangements for both
employees and organizations.
Limitations:
Research on the impact of flexible work arrangements on work-life balance has several limitations. One
limitation is that studies may have limited generalizability to other industries or jobs. Another limitation
is self-selection bias, as individuals who choose to participate in flexible work arrangements may be
different from those who do not. Additionally, studies may lack control groups, making it difficult to
determine the true impact of flexible work arrangements. Measuring outcomes can also be challenging
due to the complexity of work-life balance and technology limitations. Finally, there is a lack of research
on the long-term effects of flexible work arrangements, and more research is needed to understand their
impact on employee well-being and organizational outcomes.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the research on the impact of flexible work arrangements on work-life balance suggests
that these arrangements can have positive effects on employee well-being, job satisfaction, and
productivity. However, there are also limitations and challenges to implementing flexible work
arrangements in practice. This research has highlighted the need for more longitudinal and randomized
controlled trials to better understand the long-term effects of these arrangements, as well as the
importance of HRM policies and practices that support flexible work arrangements and promote
effective communication and collaboration among team members. Additionally, research is needed on
the impact of flexible work arrangements on different types of jobs and industries to improve
generalizability and inform best practices.
Overall, the findings suggest that flexible work arrangements can be a valuable tool for promoting work-
life balance and improving employee well-being and productivity. However, organizations must also be
mindful of potential challenges and limitations in implementing these arrangements, such as self-
selection bias and technology limitations. As organizations continue to adapt to changing work
environments and new challenges, it will be important to explore new and innovative approaches to
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
11
supporting employee well-being and work-life balance, while also maintaining high levels of
organizational performance and productivity
References:
1. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting?
Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2),
40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273.
2. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2021). Work-life flexibility in the
time of COVID-19. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, 103485.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103485.
3. Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2007). Reduced-load work arrangements and their effects on work-
family conflict. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family
handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 389-406). Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
4. Bryant, W., Smart, D., & King, S. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and remote work: A research
note. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 103442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103442.
5. Cullen, K. L., Pitafi, S., Carter, M., & Liao, J. (2021). COVID-19 and flexible work arrangements:
Lessons learned and future directions for research. Journal of Business Research, 122, 209-224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.044.
6. Ellis, D. A., Dumas, T. M., & Nissley, H. M. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders
on health behaviors in adults. Obesity, 29(2), 438-445. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23066.
7. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2021). The good, the bad, and the unknown about
telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 106(3), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000856.
8. Gatrell, C., & Swan, W. (2008). Rationalizing the irrational: Managing emotions and reducing
resistance to new working practices. Organization Studies, 29(2), 145-164.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607087721.
9. Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2003). Finding an extra day a week: The
positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations,
52(2), 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00148.x.
10. Kim, S. J., Kim, H. S., Lee, S. Y., Park, E. Y., & Kwon, M. (2021). The impact of telecommuting
on work-related stress, social support, and job satisfaction among dental hygienists during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare, 9(2), 231. https:/
11. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions,
and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International
Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 383-400.
doi: 10.1002/job.144
12. Cooke, F. L., & Saini, D. S. (2010). Diversity and job sharing: A review of the literature.
International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 190-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-
2370.2009.00267.
13. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about
telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)
IJFMR23033144
Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
12
14. Gatrell, C., & Swan, W. (2008). Gender, enterprise culture, and work-life balance in small
businesses. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 116-133. doi:
10.1108/17566260810890517.
15. Golden, A. G. (2006). Flexible work arrangements: A definition and examples. IZA Discussion
Papers, 2207. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.907513.
16. Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Martinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of
how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of
work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 220-241. doi:
10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00047-8.
17. Huws, U., Korte, W. B., Robinson, C., & Tijdens, K. (2003). Telework: Towards the elusive
office. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Job sharing in Australia and New
Zealand. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 48(3), 288-305. doi:
10.1177/1038411110373128.
19. Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clockwork of work: Why schedule control may
pay off at work and at home. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 487-506. doi:
10.1177/1523422307305489.
20. Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary
management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.002.
21. Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., Lawson, K. M., & Bodner, T. E. (2010). Family-friendly
organizational culture: A missing link in research and practice. Industrial and Organizational
Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3(3), 268-290. doi: 10.111.
