MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
l
Published July 30
Rapid isolation of high molecular weight
DNA
from marine macroalgae
M.
S.
Shivji',
S.
0.
Rogers2,
M.
J.
Stanhope3
'School of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA,
and Tetra Tech. Inc., 11820 Northup Way. Suite 100E. Bellevue, Washington 98005, USA'
'college of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA
3Wayne State University. School of Medicine. MRB-422, 550 East Canfield Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA
ABSTRACT: Application of molecular techniques to study marine rnacroalgae is in its infancy, and is
likely to be facilitated by the ability to routinely isolate high quality DNA from these plants. The
generally high polysaccharide and polyphenol content in rnacroalgae, however, often interferes with
the isolation and subsequent enzymatic manipulation of their nucleic acids. We describe the use
of
a
CTAB method for the isolation of high molecular weight DNA from marine macroalgae. The method is
rapid, simple, inexpensive, does not require density gradient ultracentrifugation, and has general
applicability to red, brown and green seaweeds. The isolated
DNA
appears sufficiently pure for appli-
cation of most commonly used molecular techniques such as restriction endonuclease digestion,
Southern blot hybridization, cloning, and ampl~fication using the polymerase chain reaction.
The
method was also tested on the marine angiosperm
Zostera
marina
(eelgrass).
INTRODUCTION
Although the application of recombinant DNA tech-
nology to study macroalgae is in its infancy, the use of
these techniques promises to yield biologically inter-
esting, and possibly commercially useful discoveries. A
requirement for the application of such techniques to
study macroalgae is the ability to isolate high mole-
cular weight nucleic acids of sufficient purity for enzy-
matic manipulations. Isolation of high quality nucleic
acids from seaweeds is, however, hampered by the fact
that these plants have cell walls, and often possess
copious amounts of mucilaginous polysaccharides,
polyphenolic compounds, diverse pigments and other
secondary metabolites (McCandless 1981, Ragan
1981). Many of these compounds CO-purify with the
nucleic acids during extraction procedures, and often
interfere with subsequent enzymatic processing of the
nucleic acids for molecular biological studies (Su
&
Gibor 1988, Parsons et al. 1990, Roe11
&
Morse 1991).
Although DNA that is sufficiently pure for enzymatic
manipulation has been isolated from some seaweeds,
Present address
O
Inter-Research 1992
the methods employed involve ultracentrifugation and
are time-consuming, labor-intensive and expensive
(Fain et al. 1988, Goff
&
Coleman 1988, Parsons et al.
1990, Shivji 1991). Research in systematics and popu-
lation biology of seaweeds often requires analysis of
large sample sizes, and would benefit from inexpen-
sive and more rapid methods of DNA isolation.
We have earlier reported on a CTAB (hexadecyltri-
methylammonium bromide) method to isolate
DNA
from very small amounts of higher plant tissue (Rogers
&
Bendich 1985). We now describe a modified version
of this method to extract high molecular weight
DNA
from marine macroalgae. The procedure is rapid, eco-
nomical, does not require cesium chloride ultracentri-
fugation, and yields
DNA
of sufficient purity for use in
restriction enzyme analysis, Southern blot hybridiza-
tion, cloning, and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cladophoropsis membranaceae
(UWCC
190), Cau-
lerpa vanbosseae (UWCC 179), Acetabularia crenulata
(UWCC 672), Derbesia sp. (UWCC 274), Sphacelaria
198
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
84.
197-203,
1992
sp. (UWCC 666) and
Griffithsia pacifica
(UWCC
238)
were obtained from the University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington (USA) culture collection. All other
algae (Table 1) and the eelgrass
Zostera
marina
were
collected from intertidal or subtidal areas in either
Puget Sound, Washington, the outer coast of Wash-
ington, or areas in southern British Columbia, Canada.
DNA
isolation
methods.
Plants collected from nature
were wrapped in paper towels moistened with sea-
water and transported to the laboratory on ice. An
effort was made to collect healthy, young plants
that were free of epiphytes. In the laboratory, plants
were rinsed briefly in running tap water and gently
scrubbed with paper towels to remove most of the
surface microbial and epiphytic organisms. Excess
moisture was removed by blotting between paper
towels. The plants were then wrapped in aluminum
foil and frozen at -70
"C
until further use.
For DNA extractions, pieces of algal tissue were
frozen in liquid nitrogen, mixed with a small amount of
dry ice, and ground to a fine powder using a mortar
and pestle. The ground tissue dry ice mixture was
quickly transferred to sterilized
1.5
m1 microcentrifuge
tubes, which were then placed at -70 "C with the tops
open. Tubes were capped after sublimination of the
dry ice, and stored at -70
'C
until needed for
DNA
extraction, at which time an approximately equal
volume of
2X
CTAB isolation buffer
[2
%
w/v CTAB
(Sigma), 100 mM Tris-HC1 (pH 8.0), 20 mM EDTA,
1
%
(w/v)
polyvinylpyrrollidone (MW
40
OOO),
1.4M NaCl],
pre-heated to
65
"C in a water bath was added to the
ground algal sample. The tube contents were mixed
thoroughly to ensure the algal tissue was completely
hydrated, and placed at
65
"C
for
5
to
15
min. The
Table
1.
Susceptibility of algal DNAs to restriction endonuclease digestion. DNAs were digested overnight at
37
"C
with 30 units
of each enzyme.
+:
complete digestion;
+/-:
variable results (i.e. partial or complete digestion depending on DNA preparation).
nt: enzyme not tested
-
Restriction
endonuclease
EcoRI PstI Hind111 BamHI
Red
algae
Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory
Gracilaria sp. Greville
Branchioglossum
sp.
Kylin
Bossiella sp. Silva
Gastroclonium coulteri (Harvey) Kylin
Smithora naiadum (Anderson) Hollenberg
Porphyra fhuretii Dawson
Porphyra torta Krishnamurthy
Porphyra miniata
C.
Agardh
Porphyra nereocystis Anderson
Gigartina exasperata Harvey
&
Bailey
Griffithsia pacifica Kylin
Rhodyrnenia sp. Greville
Neoagardhiella bailey; Wynne
&
Taylor
Brown algae
Nereocystis luetkeana Postels
&
Ruprecht
Macrocystis integrifolia Rory
Costaria costata (C. Agardh) Saunders
Laminaria saccharina (L.) Lamouroux
Alaria rnarginata Postels
&
Ruprecht
Hedophyllum sessile (C. Agardh) Setchell
Agarum fim briatum Harvey
Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt
Sphacelaria
sp.
Lyngbye
Petalonia debilis (C. Agardh] Derbes
&
Solier
Scytoslphon lomentaria (Lyngbye)
J.
Agardh
Focus
sp.
(L.)
Green algae
Acetabularia crenulata Lamouroux
Caulerpa vanbosseae Lamouroux
Cladophoropsis membranaceae Borgesen
Derbesia sp. Solier
Shivji
c3t
dl
DNA
isolation from macroalgae
199
sample was then extracted with an equal volume of
chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24
:
1, v: v) by mixing
thoroughly enough to form a complete emulsion. The
mixture was centrifuged at 11 000
X
g
in a microfuge
for 30 to 60
S
to separate the 2 phases. The upper phase
(containing the DNA), was carefully transferred to a
new 1.5 m1 sterilized microfuge tube. One-fifth volume
of a
5
%
CTAB solution (5
'%
CTAB, w/v, 0.7M NaCl),
pre-heated to 65 "C, was added and the sample mixed
thoroughly. The sample was then re-extracted with
an equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol, cen-
trifuged at 11 000
X
g
for 30
S,
and the upper phase
transferred to a new 1.5 m1 sterilized microfuge tube.
Between 25 and 50 pg of yeast tRNA were added to the
sample as a carrier to aid in precipitation of the nucleic
acids. Between 1 and 1.5 volumes of CTAB precipita-
tion buffer
[l
%
CTAB, w/v, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0),
10 mM EDTA] was added very slowly (drop by drop)
and the tube contents mixed very gently by swirling.
The tube was placed on dry ice for 5 to 10 min until the
sample became viscous or frozen, and then centrifuged
(11 000
X
g)
for 3 to 5 min. The supernatant was
removed and the pellet resuspended in 50 to 100 p1 of
warm (65 "C), high-salt TE buffer (10 mM Tns-HC1,
1
mM EDTA, 1 M NaCI, pH 8.0). Incubating the sample
at 65 "C for 2 to 10 min sometimes facilitated dissolving
the pellet. After the pellet was completely dissolved,
2 volumes of cold 95
%
ethanol were added and the
sample placed in dry ice for 10 to 15 min or at -20 'C
overnight. The sample was then centrifuged (1 1000
X
g)
for 10 min, the pellet washed in 70
%
ethanol, re-
centr~fuged for 1 min, and dried under
a
vacuum for
20
to 30 mm. The dried pellet was re-suspended in
300 p1 TE (10 mM Tris-HC1, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and
prec~pitated for a second time by the addition of half
volume 7.5 M ammonium acetate and 2 volumes cold
95
'KD
ethanol. The sample was centrifuged
(1
1000
X
g)
for
30
min, washed in cold 70
%
ethanol,
and dried
under vacuum. The final, dry pellet was resuspended
in 20 to 200 ,u1 of TE buffer, depending on its size.
The ilveraye size and concentration of DNA ex-
tracted from the various algal species was estimated by
comparing the migration and fluorescence intensity of
undiyested algal DNA with standardized amounts of
undigested bacteriophage lambda DNA on agarose
gels (Maniatis et al. 1982).
Molecular methods. Restriction endonucleases and
T4-Liyase (Bethesda Research Laboratories, Gaithers-
burg, MD, USA) were used according to the supplier's
specifications. RNase A and RNase T1 were obtained
from Siyma Chemical Co. (St. Louis,
MO,
USA). The
probe used for Southern blot hybridizations was the
plasmid pBD4, which contains the yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae 5S, 18S, 5.8s and 25s ribosomal RNA genes
(Bell et al. 1977). The probe was labelled with 32P dCTP
(New England Nuclear, Boston, MA, USA) using the
random primer method of Feinberg
&
Vogelstein (1983).
Gels were blotted onto Nytran membranes (Schleicher
and Schuell, Keene, NH, USA), according to the manu-
facturer's instructions. DNA blots were hybridized
with the probe at 55
"C
in
2X
SSC (0.3M sodium chlo-
ride/0.03M sodium citrate), 1
%
SDS (sodium dodecyl
sulfate), 1M sodium chloride, for 16 to 24 h. After
hybridization, the blots were washed twice in
2X
SSC at
room temperature, followed by two 30 min washes in 2X
SSC,
l
%,
SDS at 55 "C, and two 30 min washes in
0.1X SSC at room temperature. Autoradiography using
intensifying screens (DuPont Company, Boston, MA)
was carried out at -70 "C for 1 to 5 d.
To determine if the extracted DNA was of sufficient
purity for cloning, DNA from the kelp Alaria marginata
was digested with EcoRI and ligated into the plasmid
vector pIC-7 (Marsh et al. 1984) using the shotgun
method outlined by Maniatis et al. (1982). Twenty-six
white, recombinant Escherichia col1 colonies were
randomly selected from LB-amplcillin-Xgal plates and
screened for cloned algal DNA inserts. The
E.
col1
plasmids were isolated using the boiling lysis method
of Maniatis et al. (1982), digested with EcoRI to liberate
the cloned A. marginata DNA fragments, and sub-
jected to electrophoresis on a 0.8
%
agarose gel.
The primer designed for PCR amplification consisted
of the randomly chosen sequence GCATCACTGG.
Amplifications were performed in 50 p1 reactions with
1 ng of template DNA, 1 pM primer, 1.25 units of DNA
polymerase (Taq polymerase, Perkin-ElmerKetus),
and 0.2 mM of each dNTP in reaction buffer [50 mM
KC1, 10 mM Tris (pH
=
8.3), 1.5 mM MgC12, 0.01
%
BSA]. The reaction mix was overlaid with mineral oil,
denatured for 3 min at 93 "C, and amplified through
25
cycles in a Biocycles (Bios Corporation) thermal cycler
using the follotving temperature profile: 25 s at
93
"C,
30
S
primer annealing at 40 "C, and
1
min extension at
72 "C. A final extension for 2 min at 72 "C was per-
formed after completion of the 25 cycles.
RESULTS
DNA
isolation
and
yields
Using the method described, DNA was obtained
from all the species examined. DNA yields were
variable, ranging from approximately 10 to 70 ng per
mg of frozen algal tissue, and depended on the species
as well as the age and overall condition of the tissue.
Older and thicker tissues generally gave lower yields
than younger tissues, although ths relationship seemed
to be reversed in the case of the kelp Nereocystis
luetkeana.
200 Mar Ecol. Prog. Ser 84 197-203, 1992
The DNAs obtained from most of the algae were approximately the same posit~on as undigested
substantially of htgh molecular weight, migrating in lambda DNA [48 kb (kilobases)] in agarose gels
(Fig.
1).
The only exceptions were the green alga
UIva
sp., and the red articulated coralline alga
Bossiella
sp., which consistently yielded degraded DNA. Lyo-
philization of the algal tissue before
DNA
extract~on
also seemed to increase DNA degradation, at least in
the few species tested (Fig. 1). This observation is
consistent with our findings using higher plants and
fungi (data not shown).
Flg.
1 Agarose gel of undigested total DNA isolated from
varlous marine macroalgae and the eelgrass Zostera marina.
M:
molecular size standards [undigested bacteriophage
lambda DNA and 1 kb ladder marker
(BRL)];
It
lyophilized
tissue; astc,risk: repeated attempts to isolate DNA from these
algae. Ldnes. 1, Irjdaea cordata
(It);
2,
Gracilana sp. (lt),
3, Gastroclonium coulteri (It);
4,
Sal-gassum mutrcum
(It),
5,
Nereocystis luetkeana
(It);
6,
Iridaea col-data, 7, Gracilana
sp.;
'8,
Bossiella sp
:
9, Gastroclon~um coulteri; 10, Nereocystis
luetkeana, 1.2, Petalonia debilis; '13, Ulva sp.; '14, Ulva sp.,
15, Cladophoropsls membranaceae, 16, Caulerpa van-
bosseae; 17, Acetabulana crenulata, '18, BossieUa sp
;
19, Der-
besia sp., 20, Sphacelaria sp., 21, Smithora naiadum,
22, Zostera manna (eelgrass)
Fig
2 Agarose gel of
restriction
endo-
nuclease d~gested red algal DNAs DNAs In
Lanes 2 to
6
and 9 to 13 were d~gested with
EcoRI, and
In
Lanes 7
8,
and 14 to
18
with
BamHI Lanes 10 and 17 contaln non-
sto~chiomrtr~c amounts of ceslum chloride
gradrcnt pur~fird nuclear, chloroplast and
rnitochondr~al DNAs from Porphyra yezoensis
(see Sh~vji 1991 for methods) Lanes 1, mole-
cul~~r cve~ght markers
2,
Gnffithsia pacifica
3
and 8, Smlthora naiadum, 4, Rhodymenia
Utility of
DNA
for molecular biological studies
Susceptibility of the various algal DNA samples
to digestion by 4 commonly used restriction endo-
nucleases are shown in Figs.
2
&
3
and Table 1. With
few exceptions (indicated in Table
l),
the DNAs are
sutticiently pure tor restriction endonuclease digestion
and Southern blot hybridizations. The DNA isolated
from the eelgrass
Zostera marina
had a dark brown
pigmentation that did not seem to interfere with diges-
iiur~
by
ii~e
erlciuiiuciedse
Edlllkii.
NU
uii~e~ erlciu-
nuclease enzymes were tested on this species however.
The yeast nbosomal DNA (rDNA) probe detected
homologous DNA sequences in all the plants tested,
except the green alga
Acetabularia crenulata
(Figs. 4
&
5).
Ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length poly-
morphisms (RFLPs) were readily detected among
species of the red algal genus
Porphyra
(Fig. 4). Use of
the rDNA probe also revealed RFLPs among individual
plants obtained from different
Nereocyst~s luetkeana
populations separated by short geographic distances.
The north Seattle population differs in its hybridiza-
tion patterns from the more southern Vashon Island
and Tacoma Narrows populations, when using DNAs
sp
,
5,
Branchioglossum sp
,
6, Indaea cor-
data. 7, CXraclldna sp
,
9 and 18, Porphyra
torta conchoc~l~s, 10 and 17, Porphyra
yrloensls cnnchocells 11 and 16, Porphyra
thuretli,
12
and 15, Porphjra nereocystls,
13
and 14, Porphyra m~nlata
Shiqi et a1
.
DNA isolati
Ion from macroalgae 201
Fig 3. Agarose gel of restriction endonuclease digested DNAs
from brown and green algae and the eelgrass Zostera marina
All DNAs digested with EcoRI, except for Z. marina (BamHI)
Lanes. 1, molecular weight markers; 2, Alaria marginata;
3. Petalonia deb~lls; 4, Sphacelaria sp.;
5,
Lam~nana sac-
charina;
6,
Macrocyst~s integrifolla,
7,
Costaria costata;
8,
Nereocystis luetkeana blade;
9,
Nereocystis luetkeana
stipe (lyophilized); 10. Fucus sp.; 11, Caulerpa vanbosseae;
12. Cladophoropsis membranaceae; 13, Derbesia sp.; 14, Aceta-
bularia crenulata;
15,
Zostera marina
Fig 4. Autoradiograph showing hybridization of Saccharo-
myces cerevisiae ribosomal DNA gene probe to red algal
DNAs. All DNA5 digested with EcoRI, except for Lanes
6
and
7
(BamHI). Lanes: 1, Gdffithsia pac~f~ca, 2, Smithora naladum,
3, Rhodymenia sp.,
4,
Branchioglossum sp.;
5,
Iridaea cordata;
6,
Gracilarja sp.;
7,
S. naiadurn;
8,
Porphyra torta;
9,
Porphyra
yezoensis; 10, Porphyra thuretii; 11, Porphyra nereocystis;
12,
Poiphyra mniata. Arrowheads in Lane 11 indicate posi-
tions of hybridizing bands evident upon longer exposures
Fig.
5.
Autoradiograph showing hybridization of Saccharo-
myces cerevisiae ribosomal DNA gene probe to DNAs from
brown and green algae and the eelgrass Zostera marina.
Arrowheads indicate the 3 hybridization bands evident with
Nereocystis luetkeana stipe tissue, but absent with blade
tissue. DNA in Lanes 1 to 3 and
7
to 13 digested w~th EcoRI.
DNA in Lanes 4 to
6
and 14 digested with BamHI. Lanes:
1, Alaria marginata; 2, Petalonia debilis;
3,
Sphacelana sp.;
4,
N. luetkeana (Vashon Island population);
5,
N.
luetkeana
(Tacoma population),
6,
N luetkeana (N. Seattle population);
7,
N.
luetkeana (N. Seattle population, blade tissue);
8,
N luetkeana (N. Seattle population, stipe tissue);
9,
Fucus
sp
;
10, Caulerpa vanbosseae, 11, Cladophoropsis mem-
branaceae, 12, Derhesia sp., 13, Acetabulana crenulata,
14, Zostera marina
digested with the enzymes BamHl (Fig. 5) and EcoRl
(not shown). Interestingly, rDNA polymorphisms that
may be tissue-specific were also detected in blade and
stipe tissue from this kelp (Fig. 5).
Shotgun cloning of Alaria marginata DNA using the
pIC-7 plasmid vector resulted in the successful cloning
of numerous EcoRI DNA fragments, ranging in size
from approximately 1.5 to
6
kb (data not shown), indi-
cating that inhibitors of DNA ligase were not present in
the DNA preparation.
Results of PCR amplifications using the arbitrary
sequence primer and DNAs from
3
species are shown
in Fig.
6.
The results indicate no inhibition of the
amplification reactions by components of the DNA
preparation.
DISCUSSION
The procedure outlined here allows extraction of
high molecular weight DNA from a wide diversity of
marine macroalgae. The method is rapid and eco-
nomical, utilizing only a few microfuge tubes per algal
202
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
Fig.
6.
Fingerprinting algal
genomes using
PCR
and an
arbitary sequence primer. Lanes:
1,
Porphyra
torfa;
2,
Petalonia
dehzlis;
3,
Nereocyrtic lr~etk~ana;
4,
molecular weight markers
sampie irom beginning to end oi the procedure. Tne
DNA yields obtained appear generally higher than
those obtained with ultracentrifugation methods (e.g.
1 ng mg-l: Fain et al. 1988;
20
ng mg-': Roe11
&
Morse
1991).
Despite the wide diversity of potentially enzyme-
inhibiting, secondary compounds found in red, brown
and green seaweeds, the method appears to have
general applicability, yielding DNA of sufficient purity
for enzymatic manipulations used most commonly in
molecular biological studies. Our inability to extract
undegraded DNA from Ulva sp., and the articulated
coralline alga Bossiella sp., even after repeated at-
tempts with both fresh and frozen tissue, may reflect
high nuclease activities in these algae. High levels of
nuclease activity have also been found in leaves of
wheat and maize (Jones
&
Boffey 1984). DNA degra-
dation may also have occurred in Bossiella sp., due to
the extensive grinding required to break open the
calcified cells. Alternative methods of tissue grinding,
coupled with the addition of higher concentrations of
EDTA and/or extra organic-phase extractions, might
result in isolation of higher quality DNA from such
algae.
The ability to rapidly isolate restrictable and clonable
DNA from macroalgae should facilitate studies on the
genetics, population biology, systematics and evolution
of seaweeds. The utility of the DNAs isolated here for
detecting genetic differen.ces among algal populations
is illustrated by the discovery of RFLPs among Nereo-
cystis luetkeana populations separated by relatively
short geographic distances (i.e. the north Seattle popu-
lation is about
53
and 64 km north of the Vashon Island
and Tacoma Narrows populations, respectively).
The difference in rDNA hybridization patterns be-
tween blade and stipe tissues of Nereocystis luetkeana
was unexpected, and warrants some comment. These
differences might result from the presence of endo-
phytic algae that occur preferentially on the stipe.
Alternatively, we speculate that such differences could
also occur as a result of underrepresentation, or loss of
some rRNA genes in the blade tissues. Such an occur-
rence has been described in several higher plants
(Grisvard
&
Tuffet-Anghileri 1980, Cullis 1986, Rogers
&
Bendich 1987a, b).
Our study also demonstrates the utility of using
yeast ribosomal RNA genes as probes for detecting
RFLPs in all
3
macroalgal divisions. Plants contain
multiple copies of ribosomal RNA genes, usually
arranged as tandemly repeated units separated by
regions (intergenic spacers) of variable length and
DNA sequence (Rogers
&
Bendich 1987a). The rapid
evolution of intergenic spacer regions
is
indicated by
changes in DNA sequence and restriction enzyme
recognition sites, thus providing a readily detectable
source of genetic variation ~poiymorphismsj between
species, populations, and in some cases individual
plants (Appels
&
Dvorak 1982, Rogers
&
Bendich
1987a). Because of the highly conserved nature of
eukaryotic ribosomal RNA genes, such genes from
other organisms can be used as probes to detect
RFLPs in the macroalgae. Bhattacharya
&
Druehl
(1989) and Bhattacharya et al. (1990) have demon-
strated the utilty of a nematode ribosomal DNA
probe to detect genetic differences among popula-
tions of the kelp Costaria costata. Species differences
are readily detectable within the genus Porphyra
when yeast ribosomal genes are used as the probe
(Fig.
4).
Such genetic polymorphisms have been
found to be useful for resolving taxonomic problems
in the phenotypically plastic macroalgae (Goff
&
Coleman 1988).
The utility of the isolated algal DNAs for use in PCR
studies is demonstrated by the successful amplification
of DNA segments using a primer of arbitrary sequence.
Amplification using short, arbitrary sequence primers
has been shown to be useful for detecting genetic
varlation among higher plant cultivars (Gustavo et al.
1991). This technique may also prove useful for
detecting strain and population differences in the
macroalgae.
In conclusion, the DNA
isolation
method described
yields DNA of sufficient purity for use in a variety of
molecular biological studies, and is of general applica-
bility for isolation of DNA from diverse red, brown, and
green macroalgae. The method also has the advan-
tages of being simple, rapid, inexpensive, and only
requiring a small amount of algal tissue.
Shivji et al.: DNA isolation from macroalgae
203
Acknowledgements. We thank
L.
Geselbracht for assistance
in field collection of the seaweeds,
E.
Duffield for the labora-
tory cultures, and
J.
Stiller for performing the PCR amplifica-
tion~. This work was supported in part by the AK Foundation,
NSERC (Canada), Tetra Tech., Inc., Washington Sea Grant
Program, and the Egtvedt Food Research Fund.
LITERATURE CITED
Appels, R., Dvorak,
J
(1982). The wheat ribosomal DNA
spacer region: its structure and variation in populations
and among species. Theor. appl. Genet. 63: 337-348
Bell, G.
I.,
DeGennaro,
L.
J.,
Gelfand, D.
H.,
Bishop, R.
J.,
Valenzuela, P., Rutter, W.
J.
(1977). Ribosomal RNA genes
of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J,
biol. Chem. 252(22):
8118-8125
Bhattacharya, D., Baillie, D. L., Druehl,
L.
D. (1990). Popula-
tion analysis of the kelp Costana costata (Phaeophyta)
using a polymorphic ribosomal DNA probe. P1. Syst. Evol.
170: 177-191
Bhattacharya. D., Druehl.
L.
D. (1989). Morphological and
DNA sequence variation in the kelp Costaria costata
(Phaeophyta). Mar. Biol. 102: 15-23
Cullis, C. A. (1986). Plant DNA variation and stress. In:
Gustafson, J. P,, Stebbins,
G.
L.. Ayala. F. J. (eds.)
Genetics, development and evolution. Plenum Publishing,
New York,
p.
143-155
Fain,
S.
R., Druehl,
L.
D.,
Baillie, D. L. (1988). Repeat and single
copy sequences are differentially conserved in the evo-
lution of kelp chloroplast DNA.
J.
Phycol. 24: 292-302
Feinberg, A. P., Vogelstein, B. (1983). A technique for radio-
labelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high
specific activity. Analyt. Biochem. 132: 6-13
Goff,
L.
J.,
Coleman. A. W. (1988). The use of plastid DNA
restriction endonuclease patterns in delineating red algal
species and populations.
J.
Phycol. 24: 357-368
Grisvard,
J.,
Tuffet-Anghileri, A. (1980). Variations in the
satellite DNA content of Cucumis
me10
In relation to
dedifferentiation and hormone concentration. Nucleic
Acids Res. 8: 2843-2858
This article was submitted to the editor
Gustavo, C-A., Bassam,
B.
J.,
Gresshoff, P.
M.
(1991). DNA
amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary
oligonucleotide primers. Biotechnology 9: 553-557
Jones. M. C., Boffey,
S.
A. (1984). Deoxyribonuclease activl-
ties of wheat seedlings. FEBS Lett. 174: 215-218
Maniatis, T., Fritsch,
E.
F.,
Sambrook, J. (1982). Molecular
cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Labora-
tory Press, New York
Marsh,
J.
L.,
Erfle,
M.,
Wykes, E. (1984) The plc plasmid and
phage vectors with versatile cloning sites for recombinant
selection by insertional inactivation. Gene 32: 481-485
McCandless,
E.
L.
(1981). Polysaccharides of the seaweeds.
In: Lobban, C. S., Wynne. M. J. (eds.) The biology of
seaweeds. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p.
559-588
Parsons, T
J.,
Maggs,
C.
A., Douglas,
S.
E. (1990). Plastid
DNA restriction analysis links the heteromorphic phases
of an apomictic red algal life history. J. Phycol. 26:
495-500
Ragan,
M.
A. (1981). Chemical constituents of seaweeds. In:
Lobban, C.
S.,
Wynne, M. J. (eds.) The biology of
seaweeds. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p.
589-626
Roell, M.
K.,
Morse, D.
E.
(1991). Fractionation of nuclear,
chloroplast, and mitochondrial DNA from Polysiphonia
boldii (Rhodophyte) using a rapid and simple method for
the simultaneous isolation of RNA and DNA. J. Phycol. 27.
299-305
Rogers, S.
O.,
Bendich, A. J. (1985). Extraction of DNA from
milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified
plant tissues. Plant Mol. Biol. 5. 69-76
Rogers,
S.
O.,
Bendich, A.
J.
(1987a). Ribosomal DNA in
plants: variability in copy number and in the intergenic
spacer. Plant Mol. Biol. 9: 509-520
Rogers.
S.
0..
Bendich, A.
J.
(1987b). Heritability and vari-
ability in ribosomal RNA genes of Vicia faba. Genetics
117: 285-295
Shivji, M.
S.
(1991). Organization of the chloroplast genome in
the red alga Porphyra yezoensis. Curr. Gen. 19: 49-54
Su,
X.,
Gibor, A. (1988). A method for RNA isolation from
marine macroalgae. Analyt. Biochem. 174: 650-657
Manuscript
first received: February
17,
1992
Revised version accepted: June
1,
1992